Methodology
This page explains, in plain terms, how Nuvidence decides what to show, how confident it is, and how it handles the things it doesn't know. It is not a full technical specification — it's meant to make the reasoning behind what you see understandable.
Fact, claim, and inference
Nuvidence treats these as genuinely different things, and tries not to blur them:
How unusualness is measured
When Nuvidence says a move or reaction is unusual, it means the move is being compared against that specific stock's own real historical moves or earnings reactions — not a generic market-wide threshold. The sample size behind that comparison is shown, and a small sample is presented with visibly less confidence than a larger one, not hidden.
Sourcing
Where possible, company and financial facts are sourced from SEC EDGAR — the SEC's own public filing system — rather than an unnamed third-party data vendor. Market price and volume data comes from a real-time market data provider. When a fact can't be sourced reliably, Nuvidence says so rather than filling the gap with an estimate.
What "no verified catalyst found" means
Sometimes a stock moves and Nuvidence checks the available evidence — news, filings, earnings, sector activity — and finds nothing that reliably explains it. In that case, Nuvidence says exactly that, rather than treating a coincidentally-timed headline as a cause. News existing near a price move is not proof it caused the move; a lack of a confirmed catalyst does not mean nothing happened, only that nothing verifiable was found to explain it.
Opender
Opender is Nuvidence's assistant. It answers questions using the same structured evidence shown elsewhere on the page — it does not have a separate, ungrounded source of truth. Where a question involves a number Nuvidence has already computed (a price, an EPS figure, a historical reaction), Opender uses that computed value rather than recalculating or guessing one itself.
See About for what Nuvidence is and what it's for.